Feb. 15, 1957 - Nathaniel Bar-Jonah born in Worcester as David P. Brown, the youngest of four children. 1963 - Brown, a first-grader in Webster, suddenly chokes a female classmate.March, 1975 - Brown, dressed as a police officer, picks up an 8-year-old boy who is on his way to school in Webster. Two months later he pleads guilty to assault and battery and is given a year of probation. Charges are dismissed on May 26, 1976. Sept. 23, 1977 - Brown, again dressed as a police officer, lures two boys into his car at a Shrewsbury movie theater, handcuffs them and takes them to a tent he set up in a wooded area in Charlton. He orders them to disrobe and begins strangling them. One of the boys manages to escape and notifies police, who arrest Brown on Route 20 after a brief chase. The other boy is found handcuffed in Brown's trunk. Dec. 14, 1977 - Brown pleads guilty to attempted murder and kidnapping, is sentenced to 18-to-20 years at MCI-Walpole. He is later transferred to MCI-Concord. June 5, 1979 - Brown sent to Massachusetts Treatment Center for the sexually dangerous in Bridgewater for 60 days of observation. Oct. 11, 1979 - Brown is ruled a sexually dangerous person and sentenced to an indefinite sentence of one day to life at the Bridgewater treatment center for the sexually dangerous. May, 1980 - Ann Gillaspy, a therapist at the treatment center, reports that "Mr. Brown's sexual fantasies, bizarre in nature, outline methods of torture extending to dissection and cannibalism; he expresses a curiosity about the taste of human flesh." 1983 - Brown tells Dr. Robert Levy that he has read extensively about multiple murders and has a longstanding interest in torture. Levy reports that Brown's fantasies of violence are his primary source of sexual excitement. 1988, 1989 - Brown, now going by the name Nathaniel Benjamin Levi Bar-Jonah, unsuccessfully petitions to be released from the treatment center. February 1990 - Leonard Bard evaluates Bar-Jonah and reports that "numerous evaluations have noted Mr. Bar-Jonah's violent fantasy life, as well as his risk to the community." Feb. 12, 1991 - After hearing testimony from two psychologists who say Bar-Jonah is no longer a threat to society, Suffolk Superior Court Judge Walter E. Steele orders him released from the Treatment Center. Because of an apparent administrative snafu, however, he won't actually get out until July. Aug. 9, 1991 - Free for little more than a month, Bar-Jonah gets into a car at the Oxford Post Office and sits on a 7-year-old boy. He runs off when the mother, who dashed inside, returns to the vehicle and hears her son's muffled cries from underneath the burly Bar-Jonah. He is arrested later that day. Aug. 22, 1991 - Despite his criminal history, the Worcester County District Attorney agrees to let Bar-Jonah avoid jail by pleading guilty to assault and battery and breaking and entering. He is sentenced to two years probation, reportedly on the condition he move to Montana with his mother. Dec. 18, 1993 - Bar-Jonah allegedly molests an 8-year-old boy he is babysitting in Great Falls, Mont. He is charged, but the case is later dropped when the mother refuses to let the boy testify. Feb. 6, 1996 - Ten-year-old Zachary Ramsay disappears on his way to Whittier Elementary School in Great Falls. Dec. 13, 1999 - Bar-Jonah is arrested while lurking around the Lincoln Elementary School in Great Falls in the early morning dressed as a policeman. According to police, he is carrying a stun gun, a can of pepper spray, a fake police badge and a toy revolver. He quickly becomes the focus of the Ramsay investigation. Dec. 17, 1999 - Police, combing through Bar-Jonah's apartment, find a list of names that includes Bar-Jonah's previous victims. The list contains the name "Zachary Ramsey" (sic). They also find undeveloped pictures of Bar-Jonah and three boys in various states of undress. He will later be charged with molesting the boys. April 15, 2000 - A Great Falls woman reports to police that Bar-Jonah, dressed as a police officer, came to her door in 1997 and asked to speak to her 5-year-old son, a student at the Lincoln Elementary School. June 6, 2000 - Police dig up a portion of Bar-Jonah's garage and recover a bunch of human bone fragments. Testing later reveals they're from a child, but DNA testing shows they're not Ramsay's. Dec. 18, 2000 - Bar-Jonah is charged with the kidnapping and murder of Ramsay. Authorities reveal for the first time they believe Bar-Jonah ate the boy's remains and also fed them to unwitting friends and family. Jan. 2, 2001 - The Herald reports that Bar-Jonah kept a list of 27 names that police suspect could be his Massachusetts victims from 1963 to 1977. The story sends law enforcement scrambling to find earlier atrocities the suspected serial killer may have committed.
April 14, 2008 Sex offender’s death leaves local questions By Kim Ring TELEGRAM & GAZETTE STAFF The
death of a former Massachusetts sex offender, who Montana police believe
killed and cannibalized a boy in Montana in 1996, has left one of his
local victims wondering what secrets Nathaniel Bar-Jonah may have taken
to his grave. Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2002 First trial - Great Falls, Montana Nathan was convicted on three counts, and faces up to 130 years in prison, after a trial that lasted less than a week. The 10 men and 2 women jury took only six hours to reach their decision. With no friends or family beside him, Nathan showed no emotion as the verdict was announced.I asked Nathan for his reaction as to how the trial was conducted: "I thought that the judge was very bias toward me and my attorneys. In almost every case with motions and all he sided with the prosecution." Nathan Bar-Jonah - 3/6/02 Nathan received the maximum sentence of 130 years without parole. March 31, 2002 Questions raised in Bar-Jonah case Martin Luttrell, Worcester Telegram & Gazette (MA)
Nathaniel Bar-Jonah,
accused of killing a 10-year-old Montana boy, left Massachusetts in 1991
after authorities failed to prosecute him for being in a car with an
unattended 7-year-old boy in Oxford, alleges the lawyer for the Oxford
boy's family.
Mr. Towns said a plea
bargain agreement was thrust on the boy's family by then-Oxford Police
Chief James Triplett and a prosecutor in Dudley District Court little
more than a week after Mr. Bar-Jonah's arrest in August 1991. He said
the prosecution failed to tell the judge or the boy's family that there
were signed witness statements, or even that Mr. Bar-Jonah had signed a
statement admitting that he got into the car with the boy. Address as of June 6, 2002
Nathaniel Bar-Jonah AO#31569 UNRESOLVED QUESTIONS ACCOMPANIED RELEASE
Author: George B. Griffin,
Worcester Telegram & Gazette (MA)
|
|
|
Nathaniel B.L. Bar-Jonah was ordered incarcerated at the Massachusetts Treatment Center for Sexually Dangerous Persons in Bridgewater in 1979 for a term of from one day to life. That potential life sentence lasted 11 years. Mr. Bar-Jonah, whose given name is David Paul Brown, won his freedom from the center in 1991, after a Suffolk County Superior Court judge ruled that he no longer was a ``sexually dangerous person.'' Not long after, Mr. Bar-Jonah, now 44, moved from Central Massachusetts to Great Falls, Mont., where he has since been arrested and accused of horrific crimes against children. He has been charged with five felony counts of child sexual assault, kidnapping and torture in connection with attacks on three Montana boys. He also has been charged with deliberate homicide and aggravated kidnapping in connection with the Feb. 6, 1996, disappearance of 10-year-old Zachary X. Ramsay. Montana authorities say they believe Mr. Bar-Jonah accosted Zachary as the boy was walking to Whittier Elementary School in Great Falls. They say evidence suggests Mr. Bar-Jonah assaulted and murdered Zachary, then disposed of the boy's body by cooking and eating it, and holding cookouts and dinners for family members, neighbors and friends, in which he served the boy in spaghetti sauce, casseroles, meat pies and as charbroiled ``deer burgers.'' If convicted on the child sexual assault charge, Mr. Bar-Jonah could be sentenced to life in a Montana prison. If convicted of murder in the Ramsay case, he could be sentenced to death. Since Mr. Bar-Jonah's arrest in Montana in December 1999, many law enforcement authorities and child welfare advocates have questioned how Mr. Bar-Jonah could have been released from the Massachusetts Treatment Center when he had been involuntarily committed for an indefinite sentence of up to life.
Yet according to court and government documents, Mr. Bar-Jonah's 11-year incarceration in the center was nearly three years longer than the average 81/2-year stay there for someone who had been adjudicated a sexually dangerous person. In fact, some inmates were routinely allowed out of the center under a furlough system, called the Authorized Absence Program, which allowed convicted rapists, pedophiles and murderers to leave the treatment center unescorted. Many held down steady outside jobs while incarcerated at the center. One inmate, who was committed on May 27, 1979, less than two years after receiving a 25- to 30-year prison sentence for attempted rape, spent years outside the center on furlough. In an Oct. 4, 1992, letter to an Arlington lawyer, the inmate wrote: ``Between 1987 and May 29, 1991, I had in excess of 1,700 unescorted absences within the local community, and as far away as Springfield and Holyoke, Mass.'' The inmate said he worked for a local oil company, owned a home, was married to a woman who had two children, and was a member of a local Assemblies of God church. The Authorized Absence Program was required by a federal consent decree signed Dec. 31, 1974, by the State Attorney General's office and entered as an order by a federal court on Jan 2, 1975. Efforts by the state attorney general and the Legislature to restrict the program were rebuffed by the federal court in 1980, and again in 1986. In 1989, when Mr. Bar-Jonah filed the first of two petitions for release from the center, 58 ``sexually dangerous'' inmates had access to the community through the Authorized Absence Program. According to state records, between 1977 and 1989 there were 20 ``identified major incidents'' involving inmates who allegedly had committed additional offenses while on furlough. Some of those offenses involved inmates who had been declared sexually dangerous, then escaped and eventually were captured and returned to the center. Others involved alleged rapes, assaults and robberies. In a September 1989 report, the Governor's Special Advisory Panel on Forensic Mental Health observed, ``It is noteworthy that these same individuals might have been ineligible for any programs allowing them access to the community had they been in prison.'' A revocation of authorized absence privileges was no guarantee that a sexually dangerous person would not be released. In June 1991, Michael E. Kelley, a former prostitute and treatment center inmate who was serving a 15- to 20-year sentence for two rape convictions, was hauled in from the Authorized Absence Program after a search of his vehicle turned up cash, credit cards, a rope and a knife. A memo dated June 3, 1991, that was sent to Mr. Kelley by Leonard Mach, acting treatment center administrator at the time, stated: ``Due to a large 14-inch knife being found in the pocket of the driver's door of your vehicle, plus one hundred and fifty dollars cash, I hereby suspend your program. You shall remain within the facility until a full investigation is conducted and your team/case manager can review this situation and make recommendations to me.'' Those recommendations were not long in coming. According to the June 16, 1991, minutes of Mr. Kelley's ``Restrictive Integration Review Board annual review,'' the inmate was interviewed on June 12, 1991, by psychologist Robert Prentky, MTC director of research, and therapist Michael Stevens. Mr. Kelley explained that he was moving to a new residence and ``had loaded his belongings on a truck and had to tie them with rope.'' He further explained he used the knife to cut the rope and that the knife was part of a ``set of knives that were in a box that were being moved.'' The review board noted that Mr. Kelley had been working ``32 hours per week and that, in addition ... he had one absence per week in the evening for ACOA (Adult Children of Alcoholics) meetings and socialization and three hours per week for family visits.'' ``In addition,'' the minutes note, ``he had one visit per month and holidays for overnights and he was scheduled to be increased to two overnights per month. All of those visits involved independent transportation.'' The review board also noted that Mr. Kelley, who had been committed to the treatment center on Dec. 20, 1979, had worked as a production supervisor at a silk screening company for two years. ``He has been married for 9 years and has a 2-year-old daughter,'' the review board said. ``He feels he is no longer sexually dangerous because he has learned to talk about his problems and is no longer isolated.'' The board voted to issue an opinion that Mr. Kelley was ``no longer a sexually dangerous person.'' But the vote to issue that opinion was not unanimous, according to the minutes. Dr. Robert Moore, who signed the RIRB annual review, psychologist Judith Power and psychologist Julie Mack voted in favor of Mr. Kelley. Psychotherapist Paula Erickson, an alternate board member who had been called to participate on the review board, and David Pickett, a licensed clinical social worker who was an ``administrative assistant'' selected as an ``interim board member,'' both voted against releasing Mr. Kelley. However, the majority ruling that Mr. Kelley no longer was sexually dangerous cleared the way for his release from the center. He was returned to state prison and then, a few months later, was released on parole, and moved into his Pembroke home to live with his wife and daughter. It was in 1992, just one year after he was determined not to be sexually dangerous, that Mr. Kelley used the offer of jobs to lure Colleen Coughlin, 21, and Debra Levangie, 24, to a remote warehouse in Plymouth. It was there that he attacked, raped and killed the two women. At his September 1994 trial in Plymouth Superior Court, Mr. Kelley admitted to the killings and confirmed the gruesome manner of the deaths. Ms. Coughlin, an epileptic, suffered a seizure when Mr. Kelley attacked and raped her. He then hog-tied her with an extension cord and strangled her. Ms. Levangie was beaten so severely that blood was spattered on three walls of the room in which she was killed. Mr. Kelley stuffed her nude body into a computer box and hid it in a back room. He dumped Ms. Coughlin's body into a trash barrel, then buried her in a shallow grave in a yard behind his home. On Sept. 9, 1994, Mr. Kelley, over his lawyer's objections, suddenly changed his plea from innocent to guilty. When Judge Cortland Mathers asked Mr. Kelley whether he had committed the crimes in the way they were described, he replied in a voice that could barely be heard in the hushed courtroom, ``Yes sir. I am guilty.'' Judge Mathers sentenced Mr. Kelley to serve two terms of life in prison without the chance of parole. The second life sentence was to be served ``on and after'' the first.
January 12, 2001
BAR-JONAH ARRAIGNED IN MONTANA \ KIDNAP-MURDER SUSPECT PLEADS NOT GUILTY
Author: George B. Griffin,
Worcester Telegram & Gazette (MA)
|
|
A former Dudley man pleaded not guilty in a Montana court yesterday to murder and kidnapping charges stemming from the 1996 disappearance of 10-year-old Zachary X. Ramsay. Nathaniel Bar-Jonah, 43, whose given name is David P. Brown, was arraigned during a two-way video link from his cell in Cascade County Jail in Great Falls, Mont., before District Court Judge Thomas McKittrick. Mr. Bar-Jonah was dressed in short-sleeved, orange jail coveralls, and sat at a table facing the camera, his hands folded in front of him, as he answered the judge's questions. Judge McKittrick set a trial date of June 4, with a status hearing to be held May 25. Mr. Bar-Jonah is facing one count of deliberate homicide and one count of aggravated kidnapping in connection with Zachary's disappearance. Montana authorities said they believe Mr. Bar-Jonah accosted and kidnapped Zachary on the morning of Feb. 6, 1996, as the boy was walking to the Whittier Elementary School in Great Falls. The disappearance generated wide publicity, including a segment on the ``America's Most Wanted'' television series, and led to a nationwide search. Zachary's body was never found. Montana authorities said evidence suggests the suspect butchered his victim, then cooked and served the remains to himself and his friends, neighbors and family. The murder charge in the Zachary Ramsay case carries a maximum penalty of death under Montana law. Two lawyers who specialize in capital homicide cases have agreed to represent Mr. Bar-Jonah in all the cases pending against him. The lawyers, Gregory Jackson of Helena, Mont., and Donald Vernay of Big Fork, Mont., agreed to defend Mr. Bar-Jonah after his former defense counsel, Eric Olson, head of the Cascade County public defenders office, recused himself, citing a potential conflict of interest. Mr. Olson told the court that some of the prosecution witnesses expected to be called in the Ramsay case are people who have been represented by Mr. Olson's public defenders office. Mr. Olson had represented Mr. Bar-Jonah since Dec. 15, 1999, the date of his arrest in Great Falls on charges of impersonating a police officer and carrying a concealed weapon. Those charges were filed after he was found lurking near the Lincoln Elementary School playground in Great Falls. Police say he was dressed in what appeared to be a police officer's jacket, and was carrying a badge, a toy revolver, handcuffs and a 200,000-volt stun gun. Mr. Bar-Jonah also is facing five other felony charges of child sexual assault and kidnapping in connection with attacks on three Montana boys last year. Those charges carry a maximum penalty of life in prison in Montana. A trial was to have been held on the five felony charges beginning Jan. 16. But that trial was postponed in light of Mr. Olson's recusal. A meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday to allow Mr. Bar-Jonah's new lawyers and Cascade County Attorney Brant S. Light, who is prosecuting all the charges against the defendant, to confer on a new trial schedule. Mr. Jackson and Mr. Vernay have represented a number of defendants who are on Montana's death row. The two lawyers have publicly derided the evidence against Mr. Bar-Jonah in the Ramsay case, calling it ``flimsy'' and ``circumstantial.'' Prosecutors and police, however, point to what they believe are highly incriminating pieces of evidence acquired in searches of Mr. Bar-Jonah's Great Falls home. They include a series of encrypted handwritten messages that, when deciphered by an FBI special agent, turned out to be grotesque ``menu'' items with a young boy as the main ingredient. Potential evidence also includes statements from Mr. Bar-Jonah's brother, Robert Brown, who owned the duplex where Mr. Bar-Jonah lived, and testimony from former ``girlfriends'' and roommates, who alleged that Mr. Bar-Jonah talked about Zachary's disappearance and how the body would never be found because it had been ``chopped up'' and scattered. The witnesses also are expected to testify about a pair of ``bloody gloves'' and a sack of soiled boy's clothing they found in Mr. Bar-Jonah's apartment not long after Zachary disappeared. Mr. Bar-Jonah moved to Great Falls in August 1991, to serve out a two-year sentence of probation imposed by Dudley District Court Judge Sarkis Teshoian. Mr. Bar-Jonah had pleaded guilty to charges of breaking and entering and assault and battery on a 7-year-old boy, during an Aug. 9, 1991, incident outside an Oxford post office. That offense occurred just months after Mr. Bar-Jonah won release from Bridgewater State Hospital, where he had been undergoing state-ordered treatment for more than a decade as a ``sexually dangerous person.'' At the time, he had been convicted of violent assaults on three young boys that occurred in 1974 and 1977. Records of his convictions and commitment to Bridgewater, however, apparently were not made part of the 1991 Dudley District Court case, an omission that may have contributed to his ability to serve his term of probation in Montana. Montana officials have steadfastly criticized the Massachusetts decision to allow Mr. Bar-Jonah to leave the state on probation. But yesterday, Judge Teshoian defended his 1991 decision, calling it ``appropriate'' based on the facts as he knew them at the time. Judge Teshoian, who said he has no independent memory of the case, insisted that the fact that Mr. Bar-Jonah would be leaving the state had no impact on his decision to release him. ``That has never been the basis on which I would render a decision,'' he said. ``I do not believe that I solve a problem by saying to an individual that this case would be resolved because you will not remain in Massachusetts.'' The judge said his decision ``would have been on the facts as they were presented.'' ``I deemed it to be an appropriate sentence based on the information that was being made available to me at that time,'' he said. Judge Teshoian, who has been a district court judge for 12 years, said he might have decided the case differently if different facts had been presented to him. But, he said, ``I don't know what the facts would have been that would have been presented. How can you speculate as to what you might have done?'' Mr. Light responded to Judge Teshoian's comments, saying they did not lessen his dismay and still did not explain why Mr. Bar-Jonah was released. He said he could not believe a judge would not have a complete file on a suspect's previous history. ``They all knew about his background,'' Mr. Light said. ``Why was he released anywhere? My point is he shouldn't have been released at all, in Massachusetts or Montana or anywhere, based on his background. How many chances are we supposed to give individuals like this? It seems to me if someone like this comes before you, you have an absolute duty to protect the public from him.'' The Associated Press contributed to this story. |
|
January 11, 2001
MONTANA NEVER KNEW BAR-JONAH'S FULL RECORD
Author: George B. Griffin,
Worcester Telegram & Gazette (MA)
As accused cannibal Nathaniel Bar-Jonah faces arraignment in a Montana court today on child murder and kidnapping charges, authorities there are questioning why they received no official notice of his Massachusetts criminal record involving assaults on young boys. Mr. Bar-Jonah, 43, formerly of Dudley, is to be arraigned this morning in Montana's Cascade County District Court in connection with the disappearance of Zachary X. Ramsay, 10, in 1996. Montana police and prosecutors believe Mr. Bar-Jonah kidnapped Zachary as the boy walked to school, then killed him and disposed of the body by butchering and eating it. Mr. Bar-Jonah, whose given name is David P. Brown, moved to Great Falls, Mont., in August 1991, to serve out a two-year sentence of probation imposed by a Dudley District Court judge. The probation sentence came after Mr. Bar-Jonah pleaded guilty to charges of breaking and entering and assault and battery on a 7-year-old boy. That incident took place outside the Oxford Post Office on Aug. 9, 1991, about five months after Mr. Bar-Jonah was released from two years in Concord State Prison and 11 years in Bridgewater State Hospital, where he underwent treatment as a ``sexually dangerous person.'' Under an agreement with the court, Mr. Bar-Jonah moved almost immediately from Dudley to Great Falls, where he lived off and on with relatives. Although Mr. Bar-Jonah had been adjudicated a ``sexually dangerous person'' and had spent more than a decade in a state mental hospital, details of his treatment or incarceration apparently were not in documents before the Dudley court in the 1991 case. In addition, explicit details of Mr. Bar-Jonah's commitment to Bridgewater were not sent to probation officers in Montana, even after that state's ``interstate compact'' office asked for more information on Mr. Bar-Jonah's background. Michael F. Redpath, a supervisor in the Montana Department of Corrections' probation and parole office, said the first contact his office had with Mr. Bar-Jonah was in August 1991, when the former Dudley man came to the probation office to report. Mr. Redpath, who was a field investigator for the agency at the time, became Mr. Bar-Jonah's probation officer and learned of his commitment to Bridgewater when Mr. Bar-Jonah volunteered the information in an interview. ``Mr. Bar-Jonah came out to Montana unbeknownst to us at the very beginning,'' Mr. Redpath said. Mr. Bar-Jonah's reporting for probation was unusual, Mr. Redpath said, in that there was no advance notice, nor any instruction from Massachusetts on how the probation should proceed. ``In this particular case, he just showed up,'' Mr. Redpath said. ``He walked into our office one day and said he was advised by Massachusetts to report to the probation officer in Great Falls.'' The first paperwork from Massachusetts arrived around Sept. 11, 1991, according to the scant data that still exists in Montana records. Mr. Redpath was assigned Mr. Bar-Jonah's case based on the initial paperwork from Massachusetts. ``What was interesting about this was when I met with Mr. Bar-Jonah, he started telling me about his background and, of course, I was stunned,'' Mr. Redpath recalled. ``The file the interstate compact sent out did not reflect any of that information,'' he said. ``All it reflected was a very thin interstate compact report that documented the assault and break-in outside a post office and that he got two years probation.'' He said Mr. Bar-Jonah was ``quite candid'' about his incarceration and commitment to Bridgewater. ``I was taken aback,'' Mr. Redpath said. ``There was no file on that.'' On Oct. 1, 1991, Constance Perrin, Montana's interstate compact supervisor, wrote to the Massachusetts interstate compact office for more information. ``In order to provide adequate supervision in this case, additional background information is needed,'' her letter said. ``We are also requesting the most recent psychological/psychiatric report that is available on (the) subject. Please advise us if Barjonah was required to register as a sex offender in Massachusetts. As soon as we receive the additional information, we will complete our investigation. Your cooperation is greatly needed and appreciated.'' A copy of that letter was forwarded on Oct. 15, 1991, to Worcester lawyer Richard Boulanger, who was Mr. Bar-Jonah's defense counsel of record in the 1991 Dudley District Court case and also was the court-appointed lawyer who represented Mr. Bar-Jonah in his successful appeal for release from Bridgewater State Hospital. The letter was accompanied by a note from Paul Simone, a probation officer at the Dudley District Court, who told Mr. Boulanger, ``I cannot find anywhere in the court records if a psychiatric evaluation has ever been done. ``I brought this problem before Judge Teshoian and he urges your office to make Mr. Barjonah aware that if supervision is rejected in Montana, he will have to be available for further court proceedings in this Commonwealth,'' Mr. Simone wrote. ``Perhaps some communication from your office to Montana would be helpful to Mr. Barjonah.'' No record survives in Dudley District Court or Montana probation office files to show whether Mr. Boulanger responded to that request. Mr. Boulanger has not returned calls placed to his office by a Telegram & Gazette reporter this week and last. Mr. Redpath said Mr. Bar-Jonah supplied him with ``some of the documentation,'' including some mental health reports. Massachusetts officials, he said, also provided more information in response to the Oct. 1, 1991, inquiry. The additional information, however, was ``not in detail'' about Mr. Bar-Jonah's 11-year commitment to Bridgewater, or his criminal record prior to that commitment, Mr. Redpath said. ``The bottom-line decision was made by interstate compact to supervise him here,'' Mr. Redpath said. ``He was out here; his brother was here; he's going to live here. Obviously, Massachusetts dumped him. So the question is, what do we do? Do we ignore him, or at least supervise him for the two years that we've got him?'' Mr. Redpath said Montana probation department officials decided to accept supervision of the probation, believing that Massachusetts would not take steps to get Mr. Bar-Jonah back if probation was rejected. ``My job was to supervise him for two years, and, for all practical purposes, that was uneventful,'' Mr. Redpath said. ``Throughout that time, there were no mandates from Massachusetts for registration or psychiatric treatment or any of those types of things you would normally do. His probation was under our standard rules, with no special conditions, other than supervision and home visits.'' |